Cardiovascular disease remains a primary cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Cardiac monitoring using an electrocardiograph device continues to be a critical component in the assessment and care of patients at risk for cardiac problems or who are experiencing acute cardiac symptoms. Preparing the patient, correctly applying electrocardiography leads and monitor their cardiac rhythm are common direct care nursing tasks. Evidence indicates that a nurse's ability to competently monitor, quickly identify and respond to a lethal cardiac arrhythmia can be the difference between life and death for the patient.
While professional nursing education includes foundational knowledge of cardiac electrophysiology, research continues to demonstrate that the ability to accurately interpret an ECG is a skill that requires ongoing training and continuous practice. Evidence indicates that additional education can improve accuracy, but the when a moderate level of skill was achieved it was rarely retained.
The American Heart Association (AHA), published the 2017 Updated Practice Standards for Electrocardiographic Monitoring in Hospital Settings, identifies 4 rationales for electrocardiographic monitoring, including:
The AHA emphasizes that unmonitored inpatients who experience sudden cardiac arrest often face decreased survival due to delayed defibrillation. They recognize that Nurse-to-patient ratios are the most significant predictor of survival following an in-hospital arrest and that sufficient staffing enhances nurses' capability to promptly respond to monitor-identified alarms. Identifying inpatient populations at risk of cardiac arrest necessitates monitoring to enhance survival (Sandau, K. E., et al. 2017).
Instant
Feedback:
Nurses
outside the critical care settings do not need to master EKG dysrhythmia interpretation.
References
Chen, Y., Kunst, E., Nasrawi, D., Massey, D., Johnston, A. N., Keller, K., & Fengzhi Lin, F. (2022). Nurses’ competency in Electrocardiogram interpretation in acute care settings: A systematic review. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 78(5), 1245–1266. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.15147
Giannetta, N., Campagna, G., Di Muzio, F., Di Simone, E., Dionisi, S., & Di Muzio, M. (2020). Accuracy and knowledge in 12-lead ECG placement among nursing students and nurses: a web-based Italian study. Acta bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis, 91(12-S), e2020004. https://doi.org/10.23750/abm.v91i12-S.10349
Kashou AH, Noseworthy PA, Beckman TJ, Anavekar NS, Cullen MW, Angstman KB, Sandefur BJ, Shapiro BP, Wiley BW, Kates AM, Huneycutt D, Braisted A, Smith SW, Baranchuk A, Grauer K, O'Brien K, Kaul V, Gambhir HS, Knohl SJ, Albert D, Kligfield PD, Macfarlane PW, Drew BJ, May AM. ECG Interpretation Proficiency of Healthcare Professionals. Curr Probl Cardiol. 2023 Oct;48(10):101924. doi: 10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2023.101924. Epub 2023 Jul 1. PMID: 37394202.
Ng, Laurel K., "Improving an Electrocardiogram Competency Assessment Tool for Registered Nurses" (2021). Master's Projects and Capstones. 1265. https://repository.usfca.edu/capstone/1265
Rolskov Bojsen S, Räder SB, Holst AG, Kayser L, Ringsted C, Hastrup Svendsen J, Konge L. The acquisition and retention of ECG interpretation skills after a standardized web-based ECG tutorial-a randomised study. BMC Med Educ. 2015 Mar 7;15:36. doi: 10.1186/s12909-015-0319-0. PMID: 25889642; PMCID: PMC4356122.
Sandau, K. E., Funk, M., Auerbach, A., Barsness, G. W., Blum, K., Cvach, M., Lampert, R., May, J. L., McDaniel, G. M., Perez, M. V., Sendelbach, S., Sommargren, C. E., & Wang, P. J. (2017). Update to practice standards for electrocardiographic monitoring in hospital settings: A scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation, 136(19). https://doi.org/10.1161/cir.0000000000000527
© RnCeus.com